Тренды в ценах системной инженерии и управлении программами на примере американской военной авиапромышленности, у которой сиденье от унитаза стоит пару тысяч долларов (зато системно проинженирировано!) -- http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG413.pdf. Место про реформу, уменьшающую количество военных стандартов, которым нужно следовать -- это вообще пестня (The reduction in MILSPECs and MILSTDs decreased the amount of required documentation; however, reducing the use of MILSPECs and MILSTDs did result in additional costs to them [contractors]. Because commercial practices are to largely replace the military standards, contractors conceded that more effort was required on their part to define an appropriate specification and to make sure that all the subcontractors understood what was required, rather than relying on a government-imposed definition of requirements. То бишь аргумент "уберите нам ваши дурацкие стандарты, а то слишком дорого их соблюдать" не подтверждается на практике -- хотя практика эта, повторимся, государственного заказа.
SE/PM represents about 12 percent of the total development costs for aircraft programs and about 28 percent of the overall development costs for guided weapons programs. Aircraft development programs have experienced rising SE/PM costs over the past four decades, while SE/PM costs for guided weapons programs have stayed relatively constant. There is an even split between SE and PM costs for aircraft programs, and guided weapons have roughly a 60/40 split between SE and PM costs.
Как бы убрать изо всего этого системноинженерного месива государственную составляющую?